Maimon Kirschenbaum Earns Reputation of “Giant Killer” in Restaurant Industry

A recent article in Palm Beach Illustrated characterizes New York attorney Maimon Kirschenbaum as a “giant killer” in the restaurant industry. Kirschenbaum’s reputation for holding restaurateurs responsible for illegal tip withholding practices may be leading to a shift in the way famous chefs do business.

In the past few years, workers at multiple high-profile restaurants in the city have received over $40 million in damages from their employers, including Jean Georges, Smith & Wollensky, Balthazar, Nobu, Le Bernadin and Mario Batali. At only 34 years old, Kirschenbaum is “shaking the very foundation of Manhattan’s restaurant industry,” according to Batali’s partner, Joe Bastianich.

The “foundations” to which Bastianich refers include the widespread (yet illegal) practices of stealing tips from servers to contribute to the salaries of other support staff, such as bartenders or bus help. In this manner, restaurants continue to pay their staff paltry wages and generate higher profits for themselves.

When Kirschenbaum takes on new clients in similar suits, additional plaintiffs often join in, leading to class-action lawsuits. These high-visibility cases impose significant negative publicity on restaurants, the owners of which often can little afford to tarnish their “celebrity chef” reputations.

According to Illustrated, The recent actions of Sushi Yasuda to move to a gratuity-free pay structure and pay their staff living wages likely reflects a shift in paradigm among New York restaurants, who know attorneys like Kirschenbaum are there to represent their employees.

Starbucks Tip Lawsuits Cast Light on Hospitality Industry Compensation Practices

Two recent lawsuits in the New York Court of Appeals regarding tip distribution among Starbucks workers will likely shed light on practices in the larger hospitality industry, according to a recent article by Law360.

In the cases, two different groups of Starbucks workers are setting forth claims regarding how the chain allows tips to be distributed. The first group, hourly baristas, asserts that supervisory staff should not have access to the tip pool, as the latter individuals are “agents” of the company.

The second group, comprising assistant managers, has filed a case before the Court of Appeals claiming the primarily customer-facing duties of these positions entitle them to a share in tips. Because these individuals earn comparable wages and cannot hire or fire employees, they argue their positions should not be exempted from tip earnings.

According to the Department of Labor, the plaintiffs and attorneys in the baristas’ case misinterpreted Statute 196-d, which allows those with “managerial or supervisory responsibilities” to partake in tips as long as such duties do not take precedence over the services they provide to customers.

Representing the baristas in their case is Daniel Maimon Kirschenbaum of Joseph Herzfeld Hester & Kirschenbaum LLP, who believes the restaurant industry will try to use the case to sanction irresponsible compensation practices should the court not rule for the plaintiffs.

Client Reviews
"Just wanted to let you guys know that things have changed alot since the winning of our case against my employer. About 2 months ago, I was chosen to become one of the shift supervisors for security. It was an honor to be given this position, and a privilege to be the 1st female shift supervisor to ever to take on such a position." T.C.
"Thank you very much for representing me in my case against my former employer. You and your staff are excellent representatives, and I never thought I would have so much personal attention from a law firm. Again, thank you for helping me move on with my life." L.H.
"I would like to thank Joseph & Kirschenbaum LLP for all the services your firm provided for me in my time of need. You helped me through difficult and emotional times with understanding and great talent. I can't thank you enough for helping me get more of a settlement than I ever thought I could get." A.K.
"Thank you for your hard work and wonderful service in helping me win my claim. It was because of your help that I received a favorable decision. I'll recommend your services to anyone I know who needs help!" A.C.
"Everyone at your firm was so helpful and positive about my situation, I was immediately relieved to know I was not alone in my fight. And I could not be happier with the results." L.I.